Investigator+article

Application and Critical Thinking Questions 1-3,5 and Case Study questions 1-3.

1. Evidence could be destroyed by onlookers by walking around creating footprints, touching walls or objects in the crime scene to create finger prints, and not using proper CSI techniques when dealing with different suspected objects of evidence. 2. The investigator would collect photographs of the scares or buises on the victum’s body of the attack. The investigator could also collect finger prints or evidence on different objects in the room that the attacker could have used in the fight. He finially could collect anything from saliva, blood, or throw up of the victum that is usually an outcome in fights. 5. a. b. anthropologist-those who study bones c. anthroplogist

Case Study Questions 1. Some main challenges was that the bodies had been wrapped tightly and been placed outside the Bravo Rach which was not the true scene of investigation. The FBI team discovered that all the walls had been painted, the entire residence had been recently cleaned, and that MFJP officers were occupying the house and contaminating the residence at Lope De Vega. 2. They found the exact same soil samples on his body. Also they found as evidence “SA Camerena’s burial sheet, a piece of rope used to bind SA CAmerena, a protion of a pillow case removed from bedroom number 3, a piewce of unsoiled rope…” 3. The soil they found on the body was the exact soil that was from Lope DeVega.