Dial+M+for+Murder+vs.+CSI+Harvest+AB

After watching both the Dial M for Murder movie and the CSI episode there are quite obvious differences in the way the crime scene was handled, and in the way the crime itself was solved. The murder movie seemed almost like a joke compared to the CSI episode because of the difference in thoroughness. In the CSI epsiode the investigators are careful to mark off the crime scene to ensure that no evidence is disturbed or lost. In the movie investigators looked around for a while and even drank some tea offered by the killer himself. CSI handled the victim's body with extreme care, looking for any evidence of foul play, or any traces of her killer. While in the movie the police bought the story, even though true, as told by the wife, that she stabbed him with scissors, and then that was it, they took the body away. Also one of the main differences in the two crime scenes was that in CSI, they very closely examined clothing and other materials for hair or any traces of the victim or killer. Whereas in the movie they didn't even know to look for hair, and they wouldn't have had the technology to do anything with it anyway. That's one more big difference, technology. Really the only process the investigators in the movie could perform was fingerprinting, while in CSI they can extract DNA from hair, semen, their cameras are much faster and more precise, and many more methods.