Case+Study+ZW

The Enrique Camarena Case: A Forensic Nightmare

1. Poeple could leave shoe marks throughout the place unknowingly by just walking through. People could step on evidence unknowingly. Also if people just touch things carelessly, the scene isn't in it's original light.

2. You can't tell how far away things actually are from each other and the detail is lacking heavily overall.

3. They would look for bruises, fingerprints from the other person, and the extent of damage. Obviously they would look for bruises to tell whether or not there was actually a struggle, then they would check to see if the fingerprints matched the alleged attacker (s), then the extent of damage tells how long they might have been struggling or how much punishment needs to be assigned.

5. a. Forensic Anthropologist

b. Forensic Anthropologist

c. Forensic Anthropologist

__Case Study__

1. The MFJP was in the way. They showed the DEA where to go but did away with the evidence.

2.

3.